Performance Results


Gaming 91% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 79% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	89.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	97.8% Outstanding	Memory 93.9 1-Core 113 2-Core 277 88% 161 Pts	4-Core 547 8-Core 804 84% 675 Pts	64-Core 800 50% 800 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 97.8% Great: 103%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia RTX 3060-$270 447,556 User benchmarks, average bench 100% MSI(1462 397D) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.40 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	89.3% Excellent	Lighting 109 Reflection 144 Parallax 103 89% 119 fps	MRender 144 Gravity 106 Splatting 90.8 90% 114 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 106%
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85B6) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.40 Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	54.5% Above average	Lighting 65.6 Reflection 91.8 Parallax 56.5 54% 71.3 fps	MRender 66.7 Gravity 72.2 Splatting 68.4 57% 69.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40 77,177 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 422 431 368 388 195 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 487 Write 428 Mixed 402 SusWrite 370 95% 422 MB/s	4K Read 35 4K Write 64.9 4K Mixed 42.2 142% 47.4 MB/s	DQ Read 370 DQ Write 279 DQ Mixed 167 167% 272 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 123%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 20GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 124 126 127 127 127 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Read 131 Write 128 Mixed 69 SusWrite 125 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.8 162% 1 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 28GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 132 136 116 90 95 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Read 132 Write 114 Mixed 81.7 SusWrite 117 82% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 216% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX3200C16D4/8G KHX3200C16D4/8GX KHX3200C16D4/8G KHX3200C16D4/8GX 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	96.8% Outstanding	MC Read 34.8 MC Write 38 MC Mixed 31.8 100% 34.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.9 SC Write 35 SC Mixed 29.5 79% 27.8 GB/s	Latency 60 67% 60 ns
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 96.8% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 113%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 104%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	2,415x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	2,317x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	2,132x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	1,214x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $129Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	1,045x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	996x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	1,977x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	1,452x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	959x

Value: 106% - Outstanding

Total price: $825

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16