Asus VivoBook S15 X530UN

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago.

System	Asus VivoBook S15 X530UN (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X530UN
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190819
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jul 21 '22 at 08:14
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	13%
CPU Throttled	88%

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8250U 234,942 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	Memory 80.3 1-Core 101 2-Core 182 70% 121 Pts	4-Core 398 8-Core 571 61% 484 Pts	64-Core 555 34% 555 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia MX150-0 29,453 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 18CE) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5167 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Lighting 21 Reflection 17.4 Parallax 18 17% 18.8 fps	MRender 15.6 Gravity 19.6 Splatting 16.2 14% 17.1 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W256G1002 256GB 4,960 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6103002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 140 121 103 117 95 MB/s Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	65.2% Good	Read 251 Write 208 Mixed 176 SusWrite 124 42% 190 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 47 4K Mixed 33 105% 35 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 275 DQ Mixed 212 190% 289 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 94%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 904GB free Firmware: JU000J SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 140 140 133 139 139 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	77.6% Very good	Read 131 Write 138 Mixed 56.6 SusWrite 138 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.6 197% 2 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 78.C2GF6.AU00B 1x8GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 10.9 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 12.8 36% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 80 50% 80 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 39%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook S15 X530UN Builds (Compare 204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook S15 X530UN

CPU
Core i5-8250UIntelBench 53%, 234,942 samples	128x
Core i7-8550UIntelBench 53%, 184,356 samples	75x
Core i3-8130UIntelBench 48%, 25,471 samples	1x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	141x
MX150-0NvidiaBench 14%, 29,453 samples	63x

SSD
SD9SN8W256G1002 256GBSandiskBench 71%, 4,960 samples	79x
SD9SN8W128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 66%, 3,521 samples	35x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV512TBN 512GBBench 79%, 14,424 samples	9x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	32x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	25x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16