| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 97.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 23.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190425 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 22 '22 at 10:49 |
| Run Duration | 306 Seconds |
| Run User | NOR-User |
| Background CPU | 58% |
PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
59.6%
Above average
|
67% 123 Pts
|
54% 433 Pts
|
40% 644 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 3060-$270
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
97.5%
Outstanding
|
104% 121 fps
|
85% 108 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$32
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 77 31 10 75 17 MB/s
|
23.5%
Poor
|
19% 87.8 MB/s
|
39% 12.7 MB/s
|
11% 15.7 MB/s
|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
49GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 150 144 139 137 133 MB/s
|
72.7%
Very good
|
70% 314 MB/s
|
110% 38.3 MB/s
|
209% 279 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 208 212 210 220 219 MB/s
|
||||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
42.5%
Average
|
45% 15.6 GB/s
|
32% 11.1 GB/s
|
28% 143 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,012 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $82Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 835x |
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 627x |
| Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples | 291x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 295x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 237x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 225x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $474 |