| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 19.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock B250M Pro4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170505 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 18 '22 at 07:43 |
| Run Duration | 174 Seconds |
| Run User | PHL-User |
| Background CPU | 68% |
PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
42.8%
Average
|
43% 77.6 Pts
|
34% 264 Pts
|
18% 298 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1992 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
19.5%
Very poor
|
24% 19.8 fps
|
11% 14.1 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 47 41 50 41 85 MB/s
|
52.4%
Above average
|
64% 87.7 MB/s
|
159% 1.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSBK.8FBD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
26.5%
Poor
|
29% 10.1 GB/s
|
14% 4.83 GB/s
|
21% 193 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical B250M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,481 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock B250M Pro4 - $85
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 280x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 232x |
| Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 174x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 176x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 171x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 146x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 75% - Very good | Total price: $390 |