Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20201021
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 23 '22 at 13:56
Run Duration	243 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$202 128,080 User benchmarks, average bench 98% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	88.8% Excellent	Memory 69.7 1-Core 152 2-Core 285 90% 169 Pts	4-Core 576 8-Core 1,066 98% 821 Pts	64-Core 1386 86% 1386 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 112%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85C5) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.77 Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (65 fps cap detected)	53.2% Above average	Lighting 65.8 Reflection 65.1 Parallax 64.7 54% 65.2 fps	MRender 64.1 Gravity 66.1 Splatting 62.4 52% 64.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 119GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 594 266 263 264 265 263 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	229% Outstanding	Read 2,100 Write 1,347 Mixed 1,170 SusWrite 319 273% 1,234 MB/s	4K Read 56 4K Write 150 4K Mixed 76.3 262% 94.2 MB/s	DQ Read 968 DQ Write 1,031 DQ Mixed 1,008 756% 1,002 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 229% Great: 280%
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 112GB free Firmware: 60AABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 106 97 90 94 MB/s Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	59.1% Above average	Read 246 Write 129 Mixed 164 SusWrite 93.5 35% 158 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 80.6 4K Mixed 36.5 123% 46.5 MB/s	DQ Read 93.6 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 104 81% 110 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 75%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 419GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 419 425 428 441 413 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 460 Write 439 Mixed 385 SusWrite 424 96% 427 MB/s	4K Read 39.5 4K Write 88.1 4K Mixed 54.5 176% 60.7 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 199 150% 200 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 134%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 575GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 150 151 153 153 151 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	88.7% Excellent	Read 157 Write 132 Mixed 83.2 SusWrite 152 96% 131 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.1 224% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 109%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 4GB 7,184 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 3GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 3.9 3.5 4 4 3.6 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	8.48% Terrible	Read 18.7 Write 10.9 Mixed 12 SusWrite 3.8 14% 11.3 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.2 66% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.48% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 239,203 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	65.2% Good	MC Read 27.8 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 23.8 66% 23.1 GB/s	SC Read 19.8 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 27.1 62% 21.5 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,803 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,642x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,263x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $153Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,410x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,234x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,073x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,467x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,835x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $104Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,106x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	865x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	770x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	724x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $932

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16