Asus SABERTOOTH X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X79  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20131224
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateOct 22 '17 at 02:17
Run Duration350 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 89.9
1-Core 86.1
2-Core 129
64% 102 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 424
39% 327 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
MSI(1462 2980) 3GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 385.69
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
11.4% Very poor
Lighting 0.73
Reflection 47.5
Parallax 61.2
1% 36.5 fps
MRender 3.81
Gravity 62.5
Splatting 46.8
32% 37.7 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 120GB-$75
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 483
Write 138
Mixed 151
56% 257 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 29.7
4K Mixed 10.2
52% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 17.5
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 7.32
21% 42.9 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 77%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30
11GB free
Firmware: ST6OA3AA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 75.5
Write 64
Mixed 72.2
53% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.24
4K Mixed 0.34
82% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 61%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB
2TB free, PID 0110
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 138
Write 135
Mixed 99
156% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.18
4K Write 0.14
4K Mixed 0.09
8% 0.14 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 76%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 16GB
13GB free, PID 556b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
5.5% Terrible
Read 20.9
Write 4.51
Mixed 8.51
12% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0.14
4K Mixed 0.55
40% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.5%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
54% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 17.6
56% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 10.3
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 54%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH X79 Builds (Compare 1,774 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X79 - $335

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $812
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback