Asus PRIME Z690-P WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 58% Gunboat	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 60% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	48.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 94% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

22 months ago, 19 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME Z690-P WIFI (all builds)
Memory	18.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220304
Uptime	9.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 14 '22 at 18:41
Run Duration	305 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	33%
CPU Throttled	94%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-12600K-$184 101,563 User benchmarks, average bench 109% LGA1700, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	106% Outstanding	Memory 67.9 1-Core 197 2-Core 395 112% 220 Pts	4-Core 771 8-Core 1,256 124% 1,013 Pts	64-Core 1,799 111% 1,799 Pts
Poor: 100% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 117%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% XFX(1682 9480) CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.4% Average	Lighting 63.4 Reflection 21.6 Parallax 93.7 52% 59.6 fps	MRender 46.9 Gravity 67 Splatting 43.4 42% 52.4 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 1TB 10,731 User benchmarks, average bench 376% 133GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,344 Write 3,003 Mixed 2,672 601% 2,673 MB/s	4K Read 70.8 4K Write 202 4K Mixed 101 344% 125 MB/s	DQ Read 1,819 DQ Write 1,617 DQ Mixed 1,693 1,276% 1,710 MB/s
Poor: 236% Great: 477%
WDC WD20EZBX-00AYRA0 2TB 20,788 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 195 198 196 200 199 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	24.7% Poor	Read 133 Write 125 Mixed 95 SusWrite 197 31% 138 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 11.8 4K Mixed 1.2 26% 8.33 MB/s	DQ Read 1.1 DQ Write 11.6 DQ Mixed 0.9 2% 4.53 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 46%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 434GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 440 445 440 439 439 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 457 Write 430 Mixed 381 SusWrite 440 96% 427 MB/s	4K Read 39.3 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 52.6 184% 66.9 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 319 DQ Mixed 343 258% 344 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 133%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78 30,011 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1.5TB free Firmware: MK7OA840 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 100 98 100 99 100 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	61.8% Good	Read 116 Write 126 Mixed 65.3 SusWrite 98.7 74% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 82%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$80 26,217 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 1.5TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 152 151 153 153 152 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	92.3% Outstanding	Read 170 Write 165 Mixed 76.6 SusWrite 152 103% 141 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 108%
Hitachi HUS724040AL 4TB 100 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 3TB free Firmware: AA70 SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 165 164 165 165 166 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	96.5% Outstanding	Read 172 Write 175 Mixed 80.4 SusWrite 165 108% 148 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 170% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 96.5% Great: 99%
Kindle Internal Storage 3GB 698 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 3GB free, PID 0004 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 7.2 7.5 7.9 4.8 4.4 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	7.63% Terrible	Read 11.7 Write 11.2 Mixed 14.4 SusWrite 6.3 15% 10.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 1 86% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.63% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KF552C40-16 2x16GB 10,661 User benchmarks, average bench 155% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4000 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	124% Outstanding	MC Read 52.4 MC Write 50.6 MC Mixed 39.5 136% 47.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 42.4 SC Mixed 26.3 83% 29 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 171%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME Z690-P WIFI Builds (Compare 5,087 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 209%

UFO

Desktop 115%

UFO

Workstation 230%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z690-P WIFI

CPU
Core i7-12700KIntel $239Bench 114%, 78,749 samples	1,195x
Core i9-12900KIntel $330Bench 117%, 66,991 samples	985x
Core i5-12600KIntel $184Bench 109%, 101,563 samples	572x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	663x
RTX 3070-TiNvidia $600Bench 158%, 218,061 samples	487x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	475x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	509x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $168Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	284x
Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWDBench 242%, 51,051 samples	247x

RAM
KF552C40-16 2x16GBKingstonBench 155%, 10,661 samples	337x
AX5U5200C3816G-B 2x16GBAdataBench 154%, 3,151 samples	241x
Vengeance LPX 5600 C36 2x16GBCorsairBench 162%, 23,486 samples	240x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Good

Total price: $1,247

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16