Asrock FM2A78M-HD+ R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics39% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock FM2A78M-HD+ R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 28 '17 at 15:50
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6790K APU (2013 D.Ri)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Memory 74.1
1-Core 66.7
2-Core 128
54% 89.6 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 215
27% 204 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Asus(1043 3006) 3GB
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1600 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.10.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
39% Below average
Lighting 51.2
Reflection 34.1
Parallax 67.4
42% 50.9 fps
MRender 32.5
Gravity 48.8
Splatting 41.3
34% 40.9 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.Y Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 199
Write 370
Mixed 241
61% 270 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 12
80% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 22.9
DQ Write 49.6
DQ Mixed 10.9
16% 27.8 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 111%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
686GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 151
Write 142
Mixed 138
108% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 2.02
4K Mixed 0.21
90% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 107%
WD 5000AAD External 500GB
386GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 36.7
Mixed 35.3
46% 35.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.18
64% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 21%
WD Elements 2TB
389GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-2400 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.6% Very poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 5.8
17% 6 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 6.4
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 92.2
43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A78M-HD+ R2.0 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A78M-HD+ R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $144
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback