Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	28.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

20 months ago, 18 months ago.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	66.6% Good	Memory 82.7 1-Core 79.2 2-Core 164 64% 109 Pts	4-Core 292 8-Core 302 40% 297 Pts	64-Core 300 19% 300 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250 25,802 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Dell(1028 2120) 2GB CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.6.1 Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	6.56% Terrible	Lighting 7.8 Reflection 10.9 Parallax 13.2 6% 10.6 fps	MRender 8.4 Gravity 8.8 Splatting 8.3 7% 8.5 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.56% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Kingston SA400S37120GB 120GB 204 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW201105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 48 79 89 44 59 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.9% Poor	Read 216 Write 72.5 Mixed 115 SusWrite 66.4 26% 118 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 7.4 4K Mixed 10.7 55% 14.3 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 77%
Hitachi HCS5C1032CLA382 320GB 1,049 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 202GB free Firmware: JCFOA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 64 65 65 65 66 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	37.6% Below average	Read 66 Write 69.7 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 64.8 44% 60 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 0443 RMR5040ED58E9W1600 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 10GB 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	47.7% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 15.2 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 15.2 SC Mixed 14.8 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 75.8 53% 75.8 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16