Fujitsu CELSIUS W520

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.67% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS W520 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3167-A1
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, , , , , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121217
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 02 '17 at 14:30
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	43%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1225 V2-$200 2,869 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	65% Good	Memory 84.5 1-Core 93.2 2-Core 182 70% 120 Pts	4-Core 258 8-Core 300 36% 279 Pts	64-Core 318 20% 318 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD FirePro V4900-$150 2,218 User benchmarks, average bench 7% AMD(1002 2B06) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1010 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	6.67% Terrible	Lighting 8.43 Reflection 8.42 Parallax 6.75 7% 7.87 fps	MRender 8.14 Gravity 6.13 Splatting 8.48 6% 7.58 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.67% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 223GB free Firmware: Z33130RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1 (A5) Unknown 100 100 196610 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 61 61 167503724583 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 23 (F1) Unknown 253 253 23 (F2) Unknown 253 253 21 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	49.7% Average	Read 241 Write 244 Mixed 256 55% 247 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 47 4K Mixed 5.9 62% 24.2 MB/s	DQ Read 159 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 6.11 51% 118 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 86%
Transcend SSD370 128GB-$74 4,687 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: N1114B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 528 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1079 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 45 (A3) Unknown 100 100 24 (A4) Unknown 100 100 48578 (A5) Unknown 100 100 106 (A6) Unknown 100 100 6 (A7) Unknown 100 100 47 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 99 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 2 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 10 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 1028 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 1 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 112081 (F2) Unknown 100 100 88533 (F5) Unknown 100 100 194312	48.5% Average	Read 266 Write 148 Mixed 189 44% 201 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 43.3 4K Mixed 21.9 82% 28.5 MB/s	DQ Read 21.9 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 15.2 32% 60.9 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23 32,491 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 180GB free Firmware: FJK2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 153645664 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4996 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 277534971 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 17068 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4988 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 58 639565859 (C2) HDA temperature 35 42 64424509475 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 46 45 153645664 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 32341103756118 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2458276301 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1444819343	52.1% Above average	Read 84.3 Write 97.3 Mixed 96.5 70% 92.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 0.98 4K Mixed 0.6 111% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BA160B.C16F Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 859B CT51264BA160B.C16F 859B CT51264BA160B.C16F 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	56% Above average	MC Read 20.5 MC Write 21 MC Mixed 17.3 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 17 46% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 72.7 55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS W520 Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W520

CPU
Xeon E3-1240 V2Intel $345Bench 71%, 4,997 samples	16x
Xeon E3-1225 V2Intel $200Bench 70%, 2,869 samples	12x
Xeon E3-1245 V2Intel $368Bench 73%, 2,442 samples	6x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	11x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
HD P4000 (Server 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 800 samples	4x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $37Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	3x
860 Pro 1TBSamsung $300Bench 112%, 8,179 samples	3x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	2x

RAM
16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 2x4GBMicronBench 53%, 4,196 samples	5x
M391B5173QH0-YK0 Hynix HMT451U6BFR8C-PB Hynix HMT451U7BFR8A-PB Hynix HMT451U6BFR8C-PB 16GBSamsungBench 54%, 3 samples	3x
HMT325U7CFR8C-PB 4x2GBHynixBench 70%, 330 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $382

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16