Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 59% Gunboat	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 58% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	70.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

17 months ago, 16 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200813
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 09 '22 at 06:56
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT-$359 30,318 User benchmarks, average bench 85% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	78% Very good	Memory 71.8 1-Core 140 2-Core 269 86% 160 Pts	4-Core 452 8-Core 797 75% 624 Pts	64-Core 1,068 66% 1,068 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 95%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Asus(1043 872B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	70.2% Very good	Lighting 87.3 Reflection 87.4 Parallax 80.8 71% 85.2 fps	MRender 112 Gravity 77.4 Splatting 69.1 68% 86.2 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB 77,062 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 667GB free (System drive) Firmware: S5Z42105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 837 578 492 557 507 507 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	161% Outstanding	Read 1810 Write 1,260 Mixed 122 SusWrite 580 207% 943 MB/s	4K Read 34.4 4K Write 48.4 4K Mixed 38.2 127% 40.3 MB/s	DQ Read 530 DQ Write 71 DQ Mixed 128 137% 243 MB/s
Poor: 140% ↑ This bench: 161% Great: 311%
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB 47,517 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 187 188 185 188 185 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	23.6% Poor	Read 226 Write 176 Mixed 116 SusWrite 187 39% 176 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 9.6 4K Mixed 0.7 10% 4.43 MB/s	DQ Read 0.9 DQ Write 10.4 DQ Mixed 1.3 2% 4.2 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX KHX3200C16D4/8GX KF3200C16D4/8GX KHX3200C16D4/8GX 32GB 2,065 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	MC Read 30.5 MC Write 17.8 MC Mixed 29.3 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 22 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 28.9 64% 22.5 GB/s	Latency 97.4 41% 97.4 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,557 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 143%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $159Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,039x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $201Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	449x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $85Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	395x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	330x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	310x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	256x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	89x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	84x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $83Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	76x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	103x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	97x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	93x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $635

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16