Gigabyte B360 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

17 months ago, 17 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago.

System	Gigabyte B360 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte B360 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	0.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180424
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 27 '22 at 14:43
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	62%

PC Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$131 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	60.9% Good	Memory 60.9 1-Core 116 2-Core 218 71% 132 Pts	4-Core 343 8-Core 392 48% 367 Pts	64-Core 440 27% 440 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$278 43,922 User benchmarks, average bench 75% Gigabyte(1458 40AB) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.98 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	4.7% Terrible	Lighting 6.4 Reflection 6.3 Parallax 6 5% 6.23 fps	MRender 6.5 Gravity 1.2 Splatting 5.6 4% 4.43 fps
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 4.7% Great: 79%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$32 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 16 62 22 60 23 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.2% Below average	Read 218 Write 90.5 Mixed 125 SusWrite 46.7 26% 120 MB/s	4K Read 11.7 4K Write 35.8 4K Mixed 13.7 54% 20.4 MB/s	DQ Read 145 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 90.6 81% 122 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 444GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 115 53 59 61 56 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Read 142 Write 148 Mixed 65.1 SusWrite 67 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT4G4DFS824A.M8FE 859B CT4G4DFS824A.M8FE 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	67.8% Good	MC Read 24.1 MC Write 29 MC Mixed 21.9 72% 25 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 25.6 SC Mixed 19 54% 19.1 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B360 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 2,277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte B360 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI - $130

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	399x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	361x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	358x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	185x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	180x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	111x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	79x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	75x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	61x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	125x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	99x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	46x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $711

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16