| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 18.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 33.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus SABERTOOTH X58 (all builds) |
| Memory | 9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20120809 |
| Uptime | 2.7 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 09 '17 at 02:55 |
| Run Duration | 159 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 37% |
PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
62.7%
Good
|
59% 96.3 Pts
|
38% 306 Pts
|
22% 361 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R7 260X-$120
Asus(1043 048F) 2GB
CLim: 1188 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.4.4
|
18.7%
Very poor
|
18% 25.1 fps
|
20% 23.9 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM
|
30.9%
Below average
|
30% 10.5 GB/s
|
21% 7.37 GB/s
|
50% 80.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical SABERTOOTH X58 Builds (Compare 1,656 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X58
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 605x |
| Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 291x |
| Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples | 88x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 116x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 88x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 79x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $380 |