Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DANA_MB
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 17 '22 at 14:22
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 64.9
2-Core 123
55% 88.8 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 378
37% 304 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2001) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6169
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.2% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 7.6
6% 7.67 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 10.9
7% 8.43 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.2%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 2001) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1670 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
47.8% Average
Lighting 57.3
Reflection 96.8
Parallax 60.6
47% 71.6 fps
MRender 67.3
Gravity 59.3
Splatting 57.7
50% 61.4 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 48%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1213 882 149 152 168 167 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 1,125
Write 1,427
Mixed 1,204
SusWrite 455
237% 1,053 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 36.2
117% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 393
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 343
252% 333 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 124%
Great: 295%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 118 118 117 118 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 60.6
Write 120
Mixed 51
SusWrite 118
64% 87.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.6
196% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
73.4% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 23.1
78% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 17
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,020 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback