Dell Precision WorkStation T7500

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Yacht	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	66.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	63.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	Dell Precision WorkStation T7500 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 06FW8P
Memory	40 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20110121
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Nov 23 '17 at 11:40
Run Duration	473 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675 4,275 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	77.7% Very good	Memory 93.7 1-Core 85 2-Core 168 70% 115 Pts	4-Core 333 8-Core 651 58% 492 Pts	64-Core 1,184 73% 1,184 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% MSI(1462 3170) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	66.7% Good	Lighting 85.3 Reflection 86.3 Parallax 77.2 70% 82.9 fps	MRender 81.5 Gravity 76.7 Splatting 68.8 61% 75.7 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 241GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR040 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 7642 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 143 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 98 98 34 (AE) Unknown 100 100 132 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 69 53 201864773663 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 98 98 2 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 14189441895 (F7) Unknown 100 100 443497111 (F8) Unknown 100 100 265369400 (B4) Unknown 0 0 1929 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	63.2% Good	Read 445 Write 338 Mixed 325 82% 370 MB/s	4K Read 11.9 4K Write 37.4 4K Mixed 10.9 52% 20.1 MB/s	DQ Read 260 DQ Write 160 DQ Mixed 47.6 79% 156 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 99%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 162GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 35147 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 415 (B1) Unknown 98 98 19 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 58 44 42 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 388 (F1) Unknown 99 99 28881280147	48.9% Average	Read 258 Write 177 Mixed 181 45% 205 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 37.3 4K Mixed 17.6 69% 24.1 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 69.7 74% 125 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 126%
WD Re 2TB-$28 16,276 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1TB free Firmware: 1D01 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	Read 148 Write 116 Mixed 117 96% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 2.53 4K Mixed 0.5 133% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 83%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB 1,342 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 666GB free Firmware: A33B Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	57.7% Above average	Read 99.9 Write 101 Mixed 109 78% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.21 4K Mixed 0.45 102% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 70%
WD Re 2TB-$28 16,276 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 149GB free Firmware: 1D01 Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 83%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB 18,744 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1.5TB free, PID 0820 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 30.2 Write 25.7 Mixed 23.3 33% 26.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.83 4K Mixed 0.21 71% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 42%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 307GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	Read 70.7 Write 62.6 Mixed 78.6 91% 70.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.12 4K Mixed 0.32 50% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 56%
WDC WD20 03FYYS-02W0B0 2TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 204GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	42.4% Average	Read 94.8 Write 98.5 Mixed 58.3 105% 83.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.27 4K Mixed 0.37 92% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 52%
SAMSUNG HD103SJ 1TB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 198GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	47.3% Average	Read 76.3 Write 136 Mixed 69.9 127% 94.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 2.11 4K Mixed 0.55 92% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 51%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 153GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	36.7% Below average	Read 91.8 Write 79.2 Mixed 73.2 102% 81.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.94 4K Mixed 0.45 83% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12x4GB 970 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 12 of 12 slots used 48GB DIMM DDR3 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	60.5% Good	MC Read 28.7 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 26 67% 23.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 5.8 18% 6.27 GB/s	Latency 60.5 66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision WorkStation T7500 Builds (Compare 1,107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 25%

Raft

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T7500

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56901stBench 72%, 2,873 samples	163x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	88x
Xeon X5690IntelBench 75%, 4,873 samples	74x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	61x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	54x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	51x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	35x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	19x
M4 64GBCrucial $92Bench 55%, 7,336 samples	19x

RAM
6x8GBUnknownBench 53%, 2,890 samples	126x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	126x
12x4GBUnknownBench 52%, 970 samples	108x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16