MSI Z77A-GD65 GAMING (MS-7751)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago.

System	MSI MS-7751
Motherboard	MSI Z77A-GD65 GAMING (MS-7751) (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130715
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 28 '15 at 15:58
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	74% Very good	Memory 86.6 1-Core 94.8 2-Core 189 72% 123 Pts	4-Core 333 8-Core 474 51% 404 Pts	64-Core 477 30% 477 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD FirePro V5900 (FireGL V) 1,410 User benchmarks, average bench 7% AMD(1002 0B06) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.101.1001.0 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Adaptec Array 512GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 145GB free Firmware: V1.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 40% Great: 63%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 938 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 38 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 48 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 7 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1505431118
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Adaptec Array 12TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 4TB free Firmware: V1.0 Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 1% Great: 103%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB 428 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 43GB free, PID 0732 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 21.4 Write 11.5 Mixed 14.2 18% 15.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.61 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1.42 127% 2.61 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-559.A00LF 2x8GB 3,453 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.4% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 8.6 MC Mixed 8 25% 8.63 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 10 28% 9.8 GB/s	Latency 70.8 56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z77A-GD65 GAMING (MS-7751) Builds (Compare 162 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI Z77A-GD65 GAMING (MS-7751)

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	60x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	31x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	24x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	19x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	13x
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	10x

SSD
870 Evo 250GBSamsung $31Bench 101%, 14,082 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $46Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	6x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	7x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples	6x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 48%, 2,464 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $265

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16