Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA

Performance Results


Gaming 89% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 79% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	93.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA (all builds)
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170723
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 07 '17 at 06:38
Run Duration	234 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$250 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	94.6% Outstanding	Memory 92.8 1-Core 159 2-Core 311 102% 188 Pts	4-Core 519 8-Core 831 83% 675 Pts	64-Core 843 52% 843 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 94.6% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3302) CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2202 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	93.2% Outstanding	Lighting 119 Reflection 122 Parallax 106 97% 115 fps	MRender 106 Gravity 106 Splatting 103 86% 105 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 93.2% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force GT 120GB-$155 13,464 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 70GB free Firmware: 5.07 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 102 102 4908382 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 -89704686935375 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1935 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 71 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 43 47247458334 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4908382 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4908382 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4908382 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 3176 (EA) Unknown 0 0 829 (F1) Unknown 0 0 829 (F2) Unknown 0 0 8532	79.9% Very good	Read 503 Write 188 Mixed 237 68% 309 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 25 136% 56.5 MB/s	DQ Read 161 DQ Write 201 DQ Mixed 43 71% 135 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 83%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4342 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 998 (B1) Unknown 91 91 174 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 54 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 38 (F1) Unknown 99 99 38401237820	118% Outstanding	Read 517 Write 417 Mixed 412 100% 449 MB/s	4K Read 45.9 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 46.2 187% 67.3 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 281 DQ Mixed 111 143% 258 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 115%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 396GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 124 110 6791 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6197 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 9667 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2434 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 94 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 184 184 48516 (C2) HDA temperature 114 101 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	46.3% Average	Read 85.3 Write 75.9 Mixed 74.9 59% 78.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.37 4K Mixed 0.16 67% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 57%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 234GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 171 2241 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2579 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7460 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1614 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 52 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2532 (C2) HDA temperature 110 95 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	66.4% Good	Read 125 Write 106 Mixed 129 91% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.98 4K Mixed 0.18 75% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 108%
SanDisk SDDR-113 32GB 70 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 22GB free, PID a7a8 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	8.3% Terrible	Read 13.7 Write 15.2 Mixed 14.4 19% 14.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.66 4K Write 0.77 4K Mixed 0.57 56% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.3% Great: 15%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$41 287,720 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.3% Good	MC Read 26.5 MC Write 25.7 MC Mixed 20.1 69% 24.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 25.1 SC Mixed 21.7 61% 21.3 GB/s	Latency 62.4 64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS IX FORMULA Builds (Compare 1,517 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 106%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 91%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA - $378

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $250Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	1,150x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	177x
Core i7-7700k VHIntelBench 84%, 9,708 samples	79x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	338x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	232x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	90x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	67x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	62x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	57x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	80x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	56x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $56Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	52x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $1,236

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16