Asus Z97M-PLUS/BR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z97M-PLUS/BR  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141104
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 17 '17 at 18:06
Run Duration285 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 77.1
1-Core 92.5
2-Core 159
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 311
39% 295 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
3.96% Terrible
Lighting 4.03
Reflection 6.96
Parallax 6.69
3% 5.89 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 8.26
5% 6.24 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.96%
Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.4% Below average
Lighting 38.2
Reflection 30
Parallax 35.2
31% 34.4 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 35.7
Splatting 34.6
29% 35.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Expansion 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0707
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 96.7
Write 71.5
Mixed 57.2
56% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 3.51
4K Mixed 0.2
108% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 66%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
562GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 163
Mixed 149
120% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 2.48
4K Mixed 0.27
113% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95%
Great: 109%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
130GB free
Firmware: GF100-07 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 69.5
Write 71.4
Mixed 69.7
53% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.05
4K Mixed 0.35
83% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 42%
Samsung M3 Portable 500GB
402GB free, PID 61b3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 84.9
Write 98
Mixed 71.3
110% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 2.13
4K Mixed 0.34
85% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 42%
Mass Storage Device 64GB
26GB free, PID 125d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 20.7
Write 11.7
Mixed 19.4
21% 17.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.52
4K Write 2.17
4K Mixed 1.35
140% 3.01 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1373 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
36% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 11.6
36% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 9.7
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 86.1
46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 36%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97M-PLUS/BR Builds (Compare 288 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus Z97M-PLUS/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $363
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback