Intel DH67CF

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	INTEL_ DH67CF__
Motherboard	Intel DH67CF (all builds)
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20111007
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 26 '17 at 22:21
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2320-$165 38,345 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Memory 77.6 1-Core 81.9 2-Core 162 63% 107 Pts	4-Core 247 8-Core 263 34% 255 Pts	64-Core 316 20% 316 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% EVGA(3842 3751) CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Lighting 21.2 Reflection 16.1 Parallax 19.2 17% 18.8 fps	MRender 23.1 Gravity 22 Splatting 16 16% 20.4 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 429GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1240 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 662 (B1) Unknown 99 99 5 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 53 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 105 (EB) Unknown 99 99 109 (F1) Unknown 99 99 6210155796	84.6% Excellent	Read 508 Write 400 Mixed 412 98% 440 MB/s	4K Read 33.7 4K Write 65.7 4K Mixed 19.7 111% 39.7 MB/s	DQ Read 149 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 19.6 55% 117 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 134%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB 13,833 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 1.5TB free Firmware: MJ8OA5F0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 82 (03) Spinup time 127 127 38686884332 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2515 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 121 121 34 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2768 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1181 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2538 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2538 (C2) HDA temperature 214 214 223339282460 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	87.9% Excellent	Read 146 Write 160 Mixed 149 114% 152 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 2.21 4K Mixed 0.2 94% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 87.9% Great: 89%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB 19,716 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 18GB free Firmware: 05.04C05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 131 130 6416 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1162 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 38 38 45419 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1102 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 80 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1162 (C2) HDA temperature 121 100 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	26.9% Poor	Read 46.4 Write 46.7 Mixed 47.7 35% 46.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.34 94% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 8GB 165 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	40.6% Average	MC Read 14 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 13.1 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 12.3 35% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 85.1 47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical DH67CF Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel DH67CF

CPU
Core i5-2500SIntelBench 64%, 3,031 samples	1x
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1x
GeForce 9800 GTXNvidiaBench 8%, 3,983 samples	1x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	1x

RAM
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 51%, 1,675 samples	1x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $35

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16