Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemSupermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+
Memory93.2 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150304
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '17 at 16:43
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 75.4
2-Core 149
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 508
45% 384 Pts
64-Core 1,099
68% 1,099 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 67%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adaptec Array 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: V1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Adaptec Array 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: V1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Adaptec Array 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70CHD-CH9 M393B1K70CHD-YH9 M393B1K70CHD-YH9 M393B1K70CHD-YH9 M393B1K70CHD-CH9 M393B1K70CHD-YH9 M393B1K70CHD-YH9 M393B1K70CHD-YH9 M393B1K70CHD-YH9 M393B... 96GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.3% Very good
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 30.3
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 6.6
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+ Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $184
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback