Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140407
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Dec 31 '17 at 02:58
Run Duration	251 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	65% Good	Memory 83.1 1-Core 71.3 2-Core 138 59% 97.3 Pts	4-Core 255 8-Core 384 40% 319 Pts	64-Core 376 23% 376 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 8496) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.62 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.84% Terrible	Lighting 2.47 Reflection 3 Parallax 1.91 2% 2.46 fps	MRender 2.95 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 0.65 2% 2.03 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.84% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 16TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 2TB free Firmware: 1.10 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16.8% Very poor	Read 117 Write 135 Mixed 121 28% 124 MB/s	4K Read 2.67 4K Write 8.3 4K Mixed 0.55 9% 3.84 MB/s	DQ Read 53.2 DQ Write 8.7 DQ Mixed 1.33 8% 21.1 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 17%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 344GB free Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	181% Outstanding	Read 1,327 Write 943 Mixed 1,086 248% 1,119 MB/s	4K Read 55.5 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 45.5 200% 69.9 MB/s	DQ Read 271 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 112 116% 192 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 181% Great: 254%
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 238GB 1,346 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.10 Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	51.7% Above average	Read 290 Write 194 Mixed 387 65% 290 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 52.6 4K Mixed 10.6 71% 27.6 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 5.24 50% 118 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 102%
Toshiba MK3275GS 320GB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 298GB free Firmware: GT001M Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	42% Average	Read 75.2 Write 71.6 Mixed 64.5 53% 70.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 0.31 4K Mixed 0.2 46% 0.32 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 44%
Adata Classic C008 USB 2.0 16GB-$9 1,800 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 8GB free, PID c08a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 18.7 12% 18.7 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLT4G3D1869DT2TXRG 4x4GB 316 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.1% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 14.6 43% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 12.2 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 75 53% 75 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 74%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	564x
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	138x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	67x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	62x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $610

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16