Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0483

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive329% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemRazer Blade 16 - RZ09-0483  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer SO690
Memory21.3 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230919
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 19:40
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13950HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 62.8
1-Core 173
2-Core 328
97% 188 Pts
4-Core 568
8-Core 831
87% 699 Pts
64-Core 1,835
114% 1,835 Pts
Poor: 112%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1A58 3006) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3425
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
4.44% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 7.1
Parallax 5
4% 5.8 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 5
5% 5.8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 4.44%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CA6-8D1024 1TB
666GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ERA0906 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2716 2928 1646 2574 3031 3247 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
329% Outstanding
Read 2,366
Write 170
Mixed 1,464
SusWrite 2,690
373% 1,672 MB/s
4K Read 47.1
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 49.2
172% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 514
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 419
303% 398 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 329%
Great: 427%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
1.5TB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1926 1966 1991 2005 2028 2171 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
294% Outstanding
Read 1932
Write 1951
Mixed 1,966
SusWrite 2,014
444% 1,966 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 88.9
4K Mixed 62.5
200% 66.5 MB/s
DQ Read 791
DQ Write 622
DQ Mixed 587
472% 667 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 294%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G56C46S5.M8G1 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 50
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 45.2
126% 44.1 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 20
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 110%
This bench: 112%
Great: 165%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 240 16" 1280 720 TMX0005 TL160ADMP04-0
Typical Blade 16 - RZ09-0483 Builds (Compare 158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 234%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 287%
UFO

System: Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0483

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback