HP EliteBook 755 G4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics	2.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP EliteBook 755 G4 (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8236
Memory	1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170609
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 09 '18 at 11:43
Run Duration	509 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD PRO A12-9800B R7, 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8G 452 User benchmarks, average bench 39% U4500, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 6.9 2-Core 6.1 3% 6.5 Pts	4-Core 7.1 8-Core 32.2 2% 19.6 Pts	64-Core 17.5 1% 17.5 Pts
Poor: 25% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 6,884 User benchmarks, average bench 4% HP(103C 8236) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.7 Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	2.36% Terrible	Lighting 2.73 Reflection 4.5 Parallax 4.78 2% 4 fps	MRender 2.24 Gravity 3.8 Splatting 3.39 3% 3.14 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.36% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ152 500GB 40,079 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 261GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0002YXM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 100 224073656 (03) Spinup time 98 98 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 829 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 71 60 13761243 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 548 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 292 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 56 655753255 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 93 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 55 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 13480 (C2) HDA temperature 39 44 51539607591 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	60.2% Good	Read 109 Write 101 Mixed 108 80% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 0.77 4K Mixed 0.2 51% 0.44 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 77%
SanDisk USB Ultra 16GB 610 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	4.41% Terrible	Read 19.6 Write 5.71 Mixed 7.8 12% 11 MB/s	4K Read 1.33 4K Write 0.004 4K Mixed 0.006 5% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.41% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB 122,420 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Relative performance n/a - RAM benchmark error
Poor: 25% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 755 G4 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 755 G4

CPU
PRO A10-8730B R5, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6GAMDBench 35%, 869 samples	5x
PRO A12-9800B R7, 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8GAMDBench 39%, 452 samples	4x
PRO A8-9600B R5, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6GAMDBench 36%, 168 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 6,195 samples	8x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 6,884 samples	4x

SSD
Pro 6000p NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBIntel $65Bench 104%, 11,104 samples	2x
MTFDDAV256TBN-1AR15ABHA 256GBCrucialBench 74%, 4,569 samples	2x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	2x

RAM
HMA81GS6MFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 36%, 6,703 samples	3x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 2x8GBMicronBench 69%, 13,778 samples	1x
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 38%, 45,898 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 19% - Very poor

Total price: $65

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16