Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 262%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 265%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics231% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive275% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '24 at 01:02
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$360
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 98.8
1-Core 195
2-Core 389
121% 228 Pts
4-Core 719
8-Core 1,311
122% 1015 Pts
64-Core 1,766
109% 1,766 Pts
Poor: 111%
This bench: 117%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-S (Super)-$455
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.52
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
231% Outstanding
Lighting 329
Reflection 332
Parallax 352
268% 338 fps
MRender 479
Gravity 280
Splatting 223
255% 327 fps
Poor: 186%
This bench: 231%
Great: 230%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TB
442GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR411
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2499 649 380 462 367 399 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 2,123
Write 3,960
Mixed 2,530
SusWrite 793
532% 2,351 MB/s
4K Read 56.9
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 79.6
261% 91.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,629
DQ Write 1,076
DQ Mixed 1,459
1,060% 1,388 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 275%
Great: 419%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-6000J3038F162x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
200% Outstanding
MC Read 77
MC Write 67.4
MC Mixed 73.6
208% 72.7 GB/s
SC Read 56
SC Write 64.4
SC Mixed 63.2
175% 61.2 GB/s
Latency 42.1
95% 42.1 ns
Poor: 151%
This bench: 200%
Great: 263%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 17: 0P 0R 0G 17B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
17% 40% 42 358 59 60 24.1" 1920 1080 SAM0F90 LC24RG50
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 393 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 414%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 421%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $2,370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback