Today's hottest deals

Megaport 323481

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 187%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 199%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics186% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive280% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMegaport 323481  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star PRO B650M-B (MS-7E28)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 16 '24 at 11:47
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700-$269
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 77.7
1-Core 169
2-Core 337
102% 194 Pts
4-Core 669
8-Core 1,178
111% 924 Pts
64-Core 1,863
115% 1,863 Pts
Poor: 98%
This bench: 101%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$500
Gainward(10B0 F303) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5350 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 561.09
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
186% Outstanding
Lighting 260
Reflection 254
Parallax 266
212% 260 fps
MRender 340
Gravity 234
Splatting 185
199% 253 fps
Poor: 161%
This bench: 186%
Great: 204%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
768GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR313
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2401 2461 1321 486 365 422 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 1,952
Write 2,411
Mixed 2,080
SusWrite 1,243
434% 1,921 MB/s
4K Read 51.5
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 63.6
218% 75.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,618
DQ Write 1,032
DQ Mixed 1,714
1,173% 1,455 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 280%
Great: 394%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF560C40-16 KF560C36-16 32GB
4800, 4800 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
150% Outstanding
MC Read 55.7
MC Write 52.9
MC Mixed 52.8
154% 53.8 GB/s
SC Read 50.4
SC Write 57.2
SC Mixed 50.3
150% 52.6 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 130%
This bench: 150%
Great: 194%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 27" 1920 1017 MSI4CA9 MSI G27C4 E2
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback