HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	93.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8394
Memory	8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170929
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 20 '18 at 21:39
Run Duration	85 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Memory 82.8 1-Core 86.8 2-Core 166 66% 112 Pts	4-Core 290 8-Core 496 48% 393 Pts	64-Core 471 29% 471 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% HP(103C 8394) ≥ 4GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.659.0 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	21.4% Poor	Lighting 28 Reflection 28 Parallax 38.6 23% 31.5 fps	MRender 14.4 Gravity 30.8 Splatting 22.8 19% 22.7 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 56%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 225GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 8 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 10 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 60 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 2 (F1) Unknown 99 99 553549628	93.8% Outstanding	Read 489 Write 452 Mixed 482 106% 474 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 51.7 4K Mixed 35.3 110% 37.1 MB/s	DQ Read 303 DQ Write 245 DQ Mixed 122 133% 223 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 93.8% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP26D4S9S8MH-8 Samsung M471A5244BB0-CRC 12GB 170 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2667, 2400 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.7% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 15.1 MC Mixed 11.5 40% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 14.6 SC Mixed 12.2 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 75.4 53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx Builds (Compare 1,434 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	1,240x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	194x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	319x
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	299x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	261x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	166x
CA1-8D128-HP 128GBLiteonBench 117%, 4,097 samples	73x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshiba $33Bench 125%, 44,050 samples	66x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	142x
HP26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 2,916 samples	77x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16