| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock 970M Pro3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160617 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 28 '18 at 12:28 |
| Run Duration | 117 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 10% |
PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
61.2%
Good
|
54% 85 Pts
|
36% 298 Pts
|
24% 386 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Device(0000 0000) 3GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13
|
55.8%
Above average
|
56% 65.8 fps
|
56% 68 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
894GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
97.5%
Outstanding
|
121% 161 MB/s
|
69% 0.82 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate M3 Portable 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 61b5
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
|
56.7%
Above average
|
133% 106 MB/s
|
167% 1.96 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
24.1%
Poor
|
21% 7.3 GB/s
|
22% 7.77 GB/s
|
53% 75.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 843 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 289x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 228x |
| FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 70x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 92x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 51x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 47x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $217 |