Asrock 990FX Killer

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 990FX Killer (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141014
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 01 '18 at 23:52
Run Duration	309 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320-$175 106,454 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	63.2% Good	Memory 86 1-Core 64 2-Core 110 56% 86.5 Pts	4-Core 220 8-Core 386 37% 303 Pts	64-Core 387 24% 387 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3733) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.8% Below average	Lighting 37.9 Reflection 28.7 Parallax 30 31% 32.2 fps	MRender 38.2 Gravity 38.8 Splatting 35.5 30% 37.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: 521ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 9237515 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 105716325039651 (0C) Power cycle count 91 91 9290 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 442 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 23 41 42952359959 (C2) HDA temperature 23 41 42952359959 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 9237515 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 9237515 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 9237515 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 25099 (EA) Unknown 0 0 28865 (F1) Unknown 0 0 28865 (F2) Unknown 0 0 28563	45.2% Average	Read 159 Write 178 Mixed 126 34% 154 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 62.9 4K Mixed 13.8 77% 31.3 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 29.4 47% 90.2 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 374GB free Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 220044348 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 61 61 40067 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 85 60 371033736 (09) Power-on hours count 74 74 23226 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 85 37 15942 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 78 60 387317782 (C2) HDA temperature 22 40 55834574870 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 27 16 220044348 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -112519553152468 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1330223019 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2010181160	64% Good	Read 111 Write 112 Mixed 94.7 79% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 1.76 4K Mixed 0.66 136% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 70%
FANTOM HD204UI 2TB 84 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 250GB free, PID 1340 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	20.1% Poor	Read 36.6 Write 38.8 Mixed 37.8 49% 37.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 2.01 4K Mixed 0.41 84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 22%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 16GB 2,737 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 15GB free, PID 007a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	6.62% Terrible	Read 23.2 Write 7.25 Mixed 7.64 13% 12.7 MB/s	4K Read 7.01 4K Write 0.005 4K Mixed 0.002 26% 2.34 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.62% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C8 4x4GB 1,744 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46.7% Average	MC Read 19 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 17 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 13.2 27% 9.53 GB/s	Latency 71.3 56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 257 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	138x
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	29x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	19x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	22x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	18x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	12x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	10x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	5x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $494

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16