| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 35.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asrock AB350M (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180116 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 04 '18 at 01:36 |
| Run Duration | 153 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 19% |
PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
70.1%
Very good
|
69% 124 Pts
|
54% 402 Pts
|
25% 405 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Palit(1569 1184) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77
|
35.4%
Below average
|
35% 44.5 fps
|
37% 46.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
49.1%
Average
|
63% 84.1 MB/s
|
46% 0.47 MB/s
| |
|
|
18.1%
Very poor
|
31% 26.6 MB/s
|
122% 3.06 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBR2 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
|
43.8%
Average
|
43% 14.9 GB/s
|
43% 15.1 GB/s
|
40% 101 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical AB350M Builds (Compare 373 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock AB350M
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 77x |
| Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples | 47x |
| Ryzen 5 1400AMD $87Bench 61%, 71,313 samples | 40x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 55x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 46x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 43x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 103% - Outstanding | Total price: $298 |