Sony SVE1111M1EW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemSony SVE1111M1EW  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120522
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateJan 31 '16 at 13:07
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-1800 APU (2012 M.Za)
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
30% Poor
Memory 55.2
1-Core 10.2
2-Core 34.2
25% 33.2 Pts
4-Core 29.6
8-Core 34.9
4% 32.2 Pts
64-Core 38.7
2% 38.7 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 30%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7300 Series Graphics
Sony(104D 90AD) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.930.13.1000
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.2% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 1.92
Parallax 1.84
1% 1.72 fps
MRender 1.95
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.87
1% 1.56 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.2%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
382GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 89.2
Write 94.4
Mixed 82.5
67% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.26
80% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 5.3
13% 4.53 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 4.3
9% 3.17 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback