Biostar TP55

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	19.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Biostar TP55 (all builds)
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100602
Uptime	7.9 Days
Run Date	Feb 06 '18 at 13:35
Run Duration	216 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 760-$100 34,495 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Memory 93.9 1-Core 80.8 2-Core 149 66% 108 Pts	4-Core 297 8-Core 296 40% 296 Pts	64-Core 299 18% 299 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti (448 Core LE) 2,165 User benchmarks, average bench 19% MSI(1462 2574) 1.2GB CLim: 732 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Lighting 22.7 Reflection 35.1 Parallax 25.1 18% 27.6 fps	MRender 37.3 Gravity 17.8 Splatting 25.4 22% 26.8 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST9160821AS 160GB-$60 3,340 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 109GB free Firmware: 3.BHD Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 99 99 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2528 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 15 (07) Seek error rate 63 60 146108400446 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 2274 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1978 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 3036 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 34 116486111263 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 922 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 72 72 57108 (C2) HDA temperature 31 66 51539607583 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 75 48 122108148 (C5) Current pending sector count 99 99 22 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 99 99 22 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	24.4% Poor	Read 42.4 Write 42.5 Mixed 20.2 26% 35 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.63 4K Mixed 0.28 63% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 24%
Seagate ST320DM001 HD322GJ 320GB 590 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 121GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1AR10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 319 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 82 73 5739 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1209 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5851 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1040 (BF) G-sense error rate 64 64 368922 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 43 244813529117 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 84 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 1 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1241	71% Very good	Read 127 Write 120 Mixed 77.4 80% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.77 4K Mixed 0.37 92% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 82%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 38GB free Firmware: 03.03E03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 2 (03) Spinup time 133 131 4308 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4996 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 6962 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3862 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 65548 (BE) vendor-specific 67 34 33 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 123 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4995 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0
Poor: 23% Great: 58%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22 56,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 41GB free Firmware: 58.01D58 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 151 143 3450 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2821 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 17949 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1971 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 276 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2934 (C2) HDA temperature 114 94 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	31.3% Below average	Read 66 Write 42.6 Mixed 27 33% 45.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.79 4K Mixed 0.23 79% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 0, 0 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	40.1% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 11.9 MC Mixed 11.6 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 10.3 32% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 60 67% 60 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TP55 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar TP55

CPU
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	5x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	3x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 460 SENvidiaBench 10%, 3,122 samples	2x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	2x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	1x

SSD
MX300 525GBCrucial $150Bench 86%, 105,037 samples	2x
HyperX 3K 120GBKingston $100Bench 74%, 46,066 samples	1x
840 120GBSamsung $109Bench 61%, 51,792 samples	1x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	4x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	4x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $250

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16