Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom x5-Z8350 9,056 User benchmarks, average bench 21% CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	24.7% Poor	Memory 38.3 1-Core 18.2 2-Core 33.6 21% 30 Pts	4-Core 65.4 8-Core 65.1 9% 65.2 Pts	64-Core 64.1 4% 64.1 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 16,763 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 7270) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4444 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.15% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 1.54 Parallax 1.94 1% 1.59 fps	MRender 1.57 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 1.87 1% 1.58 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.15% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hynix HBG4a2 31GB 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10.4 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	26.8% Poor	Read 142 Write 122 Mixed 133 30% 132 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 24.4 4K Mixed 2.84 46% 15.5 MB/s	DQ Read 17.5 DQ Write 30.6 DQ Mixed 2.75 8% 17 MB/s

SanDisk Cruzer Facet 16GB 1,259 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 8GB free, PID 5576 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	6.24% Terrible	Read 18.8 Write 4.76 Mixed 6.8 10% 10.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.19 4K Write 0.48 4K Mixed 0.75 57% 1.81 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.24% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.6% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 4.2 14% 4.73 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 2.8 9% 3.2 GB/s	Latency 210 19% 210 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16