Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics65.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive250% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX CODE  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 12 '18 at 04:10
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Memory 94.3
1-Core 157
2-Core 306
102% 186 Pts
4-Core 537
8-Core 869
86% 703 Pts
64-Core 872
54% 872 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.8% Good
Lighting 82.8
Reflection 82.3
Parallax 79.1
68% 81.4 fps
MRender 74.3
Gravity 75.9
Splatting 77.9
62% 76 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
434GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 410
Mixed 417
99% 446 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 51.4
189% 66.4 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 129
150% 260 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 118%
Great: 134%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 1,995
Write 1,102
Mixed 1,114
309% 1,403 MB/s
4K Read 57.4
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 47.1
220% 80.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,050
DQ Write 637
DQ Mixed 263
352% 650 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 250%
Great: 236%
WD Elements 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 36.6
Write 35.8
Mixed 18.3
37% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.94
4K Mixed 0.37
81% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2197 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.6% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 20.8
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 19.5
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 59
68% 59 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,300 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,133
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback