Gigabyte GA-M4HM87P-00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	62.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-M4HM87P-00 (all builds)
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20141210
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 22 '16 at 21:13
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770R 317 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	79.1% Very good	Memory 82.8 1-Core 107 2-Core 216 76% 135 Pts	4-Core 412 8-Core 559 61% 485 Pts	64-Core 565 35% 565 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 80%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 mSATA 500GB-$79 522 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 338GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1606 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 54 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 4 (AE) Unknown 100 100 32 (B4) Unknown 0 0 5524 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 42 6 403728498746 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 1046926317 (F7) Unknown 100 100 32869352 (F8) Unknown 100 100 52163464	62.5% Good	Read 301 Write 317 Mixed 249 65% 289 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 70.4 4K Mixed 14.9 98% 37.5 MB/s	DQ Read 28 DQ Write 94.8 DQ Mixed 14.9 25% 45.9 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 110%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 11,776 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 3.5TB free Firmware: 9401 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Read 96.6 Write 118 Mixed 81.6 74% 98.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.28 4K Write 7.34 4K Mixed 0.59 255% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 87%
Kingston DT microDuo 16GB 1,088 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 14GB free, PID 16a1 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	7.42% Terrible	Read 21.8 Write 12.1 Mixed 12.5 18% 15.5 MB/s	4K Read 6.76 4K Write 0.007 4K Mixed 0.01 26% 2.26 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.42% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BF160B.M16 1315 BLS8G3N169ES4.16FE 16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	67.8% Good	MC Read 37.2 MC Write 19.4 MC Mixed 18.1 71% 24.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 18.9 SC Mixed 17.2 46% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 75.5 53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-M4HM87P-00 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-M4HM87P-00

CPU
Core i7-4770RIntelBench 72%, 317 samples	28x

GPU
Iris Pro HD 5200 (V1 Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 6%, 1,166 samples	27x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	1x

SSD
SSDMCEAW240A4 240GBIntelBench 69%, 206 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x
840 Evo mSATA 250GBSamsung $299Bench 89%, 1,431 samples	2x

RAM
99U5428-018.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 51%, 4,502 samples	4x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 1x8GBKingstonBench 28%, 2,625 samples	2x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBKingstonBench 55%, 10,168 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16