| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 81.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 85% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asrock X99 Extreme4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 53.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20151223 |
| Uptime | 0.6 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 05 '18 at 19:42 |
| Run Duration | 82 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
76.6%
Very good
|
74% 131 Pts
|
64% 529 Pts
|
50% 801 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 3994) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
81.3%
Excellent
|
86% 103 fps
|
73% 89.3 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
85%
Excellent
|
99% 444 MB/s
|
124% 42.9 MB/s
|
30% 50.3 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
64.8%
Good
|
67% 23.5 GB/s
|
49% 17.1 GB/s
|
50% 80.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X99 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 807 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4 - $261
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 466x |
| Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 109x |
| Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples | 47x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 85x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 75x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 46x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $997 |