| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 37.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asrock 960GM-VGS3 FX (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20131002 |
| Uptime | 1.5 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 15 '18 at 01:40 |
| Run Duration | 121 Seconds |
| Run User | ROU-User |
| Background CPU | 12% |
PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.7%
Good
|
62% 99 Pts
|
35% 275 Pts
|
19% 308 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 1060 MHz, MLim: 1570 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.2.1
|
37.6%
Below average
|
38% 53.3 fps
|
37% 45.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
59.8%
Above average
|
75% 100 MB/s
|
84% 0.93 MB/s
| |
|
|
34%
Below average
|
37% 50.5 MB/s
|
105% 0.98 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM 333 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
45.1%
Average
|
45% 15.9 GB/s
|
29% 10 GB/s
|
60% 66.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 960GM-VGS3 FX Builds (Compare 213 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 960GM-VGS3 FX - $59
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 81x |
| FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples | 25x |
| FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples | 15x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 17x |
| Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 13x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 10x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $193 |