Asus X79-DELUXE

Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 69% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	89.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	82.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X79-DELUXE (all builds)
Memory	19.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160202
Uptime	20 Days
Run Date	May 05 '18 at 12:36
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4930K-$88 22,204 User benchmarks, average bench 77% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	83.5% Excellent	Memory 94.1 1-Core 90.7 2-Core 186 73% 124 Pts	4-Core 394 8-Core 641 63% 517 Pts	64-Core 841 52% 841 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 88%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% EVGA(3842 6160) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Lighting 67.8 Reflection 65.1 Parallax 57.8 55% 63.6 fps	MRender 69.1 Gravity 62.3 Splatting 66.3 54% 65.9 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 56%
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6276) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	89.8% Excellent	Lighting 114 Reflection 116 Parallax 99.1 93% 109 fps	MRender 98.5 Gravity 104 Splatting 104 84% 102 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 152GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 19943 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 101 (B1) Unknown 98 98 113 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 54 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 34 (F1) Unknown 99 99 16663884310	82.8% Excellent	Read 513 Write 479 Mixed 487 110% 493 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 54.3 4K Mixed 21.6 96% 34 MB/s	DQ Read 29.4 DQ Write 159 DQ Mixed 19.9 37% 69.4 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 50GB free Firmware: EXM03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 19936 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 97 (B1) Unknown 99 99 26 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 59 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 30 (F1) Unknown 99 99 9766868578	88.4% Excellent	Read 513 Write 492 Mixed 504 112% 503 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 58.6 4K Mixed 32.2 114% 39.4 MB/s	DQ Read 31.2 DQ Write 82.2 DQ Mixed 19.3 26% 44.2 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$68 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1.5TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 191 187 5425 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1415 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 57 57 31528 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 350 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 108 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1325 (C2) HDA temperature 117 108 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	72.1% Very good	Read 133 Write 118 Mixed 115 92% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.91 4K Write 2.01 4K Mixed 0.23 101% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GB 324 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.5% Very good	MC Read 32.3 MC Write 20.2 MC Mixed 26.9 76% 26.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.5 SC Write 12.2 SC Mixed 12.6 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 59.5 67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 136%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79-DELUXE Builds (Compare 533 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 96%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 84%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X79-DELUXE - $229

CPU
Core i7-4930KIntel $88Bench 77%, 22,204 samples	236x
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples	97x
Core i7-4960XIntel $1,189Bench 78%, 5,121 samples	66x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	30x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	29x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	26x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	16x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	15x
Ultra II 480GBSanDisk $39Bench 86%, 62,883 samples	15x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 5,910 samples	21x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	17x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 74%, 7,519 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $881

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16