Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3220-$79 71,790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Memory 93.1 1-Core 90.5 2-Core 177 72% 120 Pts	4-Core 223 8-Core 229 30% 226 Pts	64-Core 232 14% 232 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 605 934 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(107D 5AFD) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 340.52 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso Rainbow Line 32GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 25GB free, PID 2910 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	9.33% Terrible	Read 31 Write 13.4 Mixed 14.8 22% 19.7 MB/s	4K Read 6.71 4K Write 0.11 4K Mixed 0.45 44% 2.42 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.33% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 1x4GB 7,599 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	32.2% Below average	MC Read 10.2 MC Write 10.2 MC Mixed 9.2 28% 9.87 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 10.3 30% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 61.9 65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	39x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	32x
Pentium G2030Intel $24Bench 49%, 18,277 samples	31x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	61x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	15x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	12x

RAM
M378B5173QH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 7,599 samples	15x
HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 29%, 4,880 samples	6x
HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 52%, 14,558 samples	6x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $117

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16