Asus PRIME X399-A

Performance Results


Gaming 95% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 117% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	66.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X399-A (all builds)
Memory	51.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170906
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 27 '18 at 13:47
Run Duration	304 Seconds
Run User	MAR-User
Background CPU	99%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	75.7% Very good	Memory 67.3 1-Core 112 2-Core 228 74% 136 Pts	4-Core 450 8-Core 880 79% 665 Pts	64-Core 2273 141% 2273 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Zotac(19DA 1474) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	120% Outstanding	Lighting 161 Reflection 191 Parallax 172 131% 174 fps	MRender 120 Gravity 173 Splatting 124 113% 139 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 500GB-$113 27,087 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 257GB free (System drive) Firmware: X61130WD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 77 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 97 (A5) Unknown 100 100 3866667 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 86 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1 (A9) Unknown 100 100 742 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 18 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 51 60 257699217457 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 1 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 34359738376 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 359 (EA) Unknown 100 100 534 (F1) Unknown 253 253 512 (F2) Unknown 253 253 437 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	66.5% Good	Read 388 Write 287 Mixed 297 72% 324 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 59.7 4K Mixed 19.8 108% 37.6 MB/s	DQ Read 31.8 DQ Write 49.5 DQ Mixed 13.4 18% 31.6 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 116%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 551GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 174 2283 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 52 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 33 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 33 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 8 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 156 (C2) HDA temperature 105 99 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 16 (F1) Unknown 200 200 1079897826 (F2) Unknown 200 200 65464471	92.7% Outstanding	Read 167 Write 156 Mixed 146 117% 156 MB/s	4K Read 1.07 4K Write 2.77 4K Mixed 0.34 133% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 109%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 3,591 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1TB free, PID b207 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Read 37.5 Write 34.2 Mixed 34.7 45% 35.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.18 4K Write 0.48 4K Mixed 0.3 31% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 51%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB 7,719 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 17GB free, PID 5590 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	41.9% Average	Read 136 Write 58.4 Mixed 79.4 104% 91.1 MB/s	4K Read 6.56 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.46 162% 3.54 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 36%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 13,169 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 14GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	7.44% Terrible	Read 21.3 Write 5.41 Mixed 11.7 14% 12.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.16 4K Write 0.71 4K Mixed 0.5 57% 1.79 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 7.44% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS16G4D240FSB.16FBD BLS16G4D240FSB.16FAD BLS16G4D240FSB.16FAD BLS16G4D240FSB.16FBD 64GB 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	135% Outstanding	MC Read 54.4 MC Write 53 MC Mixed 54 154% 53.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 34.9 SC Mixed 22.2 69% 24.1 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X399-A Builds (Compare 526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X399-A

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	185x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	124x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $798Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	74x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	47x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	33x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	27x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	24x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	22x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	22x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	11x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 96%, 10,311 samples	10x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $80Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $918

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16