Asus H110M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H110M-K  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161227
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 28 '18 at 15:07
Run Duration91 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 93
1-Core 130
2-Core 251
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 708
70% 571 Pts
64-Core 707
44% 707 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 84%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-128L9S-11 2.5 7mm 128GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HC7110A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 472
Write 324
Mixed 388
88% 395 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 32.8
4K Mixed 23.8
77% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 24.4
DQ Write 41.5
DQ Mixed 11.4
15% 25.8 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 97%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
557GB free
Firmware: SC23 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 120
Write 122
Mixed 105
87% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.13
4K Mixed 0.13
57% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
41% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 10.6
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 12.8
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 5,918 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $182
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback