PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 38.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7A34 |
Motherboard | MSI B350 TOMAHAWK ARCTIC (MS-7A34) (all builds) |
Memory | 2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170510 |
Uptime | 0.9 Days |
Run Date | May 29 '18 at 14:40 |
Run Duration | 180 Seconds |
Run User | POL-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
40.6%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 290X-$549
Asus(1043 046A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
38.7%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
|
202%
Outstanding
|
|||
82%
Excellent
|
||||
58.5%
Above average
|
||||
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB
45GB free
Firmware: 10.02E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
28.1%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 3000 C16 Series 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
67.5%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 52x |
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples | 36x |
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples | 19x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 32x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 15x |
RX 580AMD $140Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 14x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $374 |