Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 66% Battle cruiser	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 66% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	86% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	64.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170606
Uptime	4.6 Days
Run Date	Jun 02 '18 at 19:25
Run Duration	222 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Memory 72.3 1-Core 103 2-Core 204 70% 126 Pts	4-Core 394 8-Core 760 68% 577 Pts	64-Core 1081 67% 1081 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8599) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 397.64 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	86% Excellent	Lighting 108 Reflection 114 Parallax 109 88% 110 fps	MRender 94.5 Gravity 99.9 Splatting 104 82% 99.6 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue SATA M.2 1TB-$77 2,710 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 712GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41110WD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 632 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 361 (A5) Unknown 100 100 18809085 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 56 (A8) Unknown 100 100 5 (A9) Unknown 100 100 1322 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 9 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 50 214749741092 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 309238562888 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 1428 (EA) Unknown 100 100 5519 (F1) Unknown 253 253 5203 (F2) Unknown 253 253 3126 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	64.2% Good	Read 401 Write 322 Mixed 277 74% 333 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 48.9 4K Mixed 11.4 89% 30.7 MB/s	DQ Read 30.4 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 42.9 41% 62 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 108%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 286GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1399 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 844 (B1) Unknown 99 99 5 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 65 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 8 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7157657027	95.5% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 414 Mixed 419 100% 449 MB/s	4K Read 41.4 4K Write 78.9 4K Mixed 39.2 155% 53.2 MB/s	DQ Read 38.6 DQ Write 72.4 DQ Mixed 22.4 26% 44.5 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 95.5% Great: 134%
Intel X25-M 80GB 12,660 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 24GB free Firmware: 2CV102HD Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8988 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 4980 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 162 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 127744 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 10219 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 1 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 3963356909 (E8) Unknown 99 99 0 (E9) Unknown 98 98 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0	40.7% Average	Read 255 Write 81.8 Mixed 129 34% 155 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 59.9 4K Mixed 6.62 72% 29.2 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 83.2 DQ Mixed 49.7 55% 95.7 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 44%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 151GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 197 197 17610 (03) Spinup time 173 172 4325 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4537 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 8786 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2543 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 43 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4493 (C2) HDA temperature 118 104 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 2 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 193 193 1517	52.7% Above average	Read 95.5 Write 88.1 Mixed 82.1 66% 88.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.04 4K Mixed 0.34 100% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 76%
Seagate ST9120823AS 120GB-$160 304 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 106GB free Firmware: 3.BHC Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 11220 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 75 60 8664751748 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 9609 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6449 (B8) Unknown 100 253 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 89 3367306986337 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 44 437583898 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 21 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 3939 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 331894 (C2) HDA temperature 26 56 64424509466 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 84 57 243263878 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0 (FE) Unknown 100 253 0	31.3% Below average	Read 57.2 Write 51.8 Mixed 50.5 40% 53.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 0.98 4K Mixed 0.36 82% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB 76,101 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.2% Very good	MC Read 28.5 MC Write 26.4 MC Mixed 25.4 76% 26.8 GB/s	SC Read 21 SC Write 28.6 SC Mixed 24.5 71% 24.7 GB/s	Latency 96.1 42% 96.1 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 630 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 88%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $250

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	120x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	87x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	73x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	58x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	51x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	44x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	30x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	26x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	22x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	38x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $1,046

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16