Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	35.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-V LX (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140721
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 05 '18 at 23:47
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	44%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570 104,858 User benchmarks, average bench 65% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	Memory 95.5 1-Core 112 2-Core 224 83% 144 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 376 47% 358 Pts	64-Core 400 25% 400 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Asus(1043 3005) 3GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.1001 Performing below potential (74^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	35.5% Below average	Lighting 45.6 Reflection 31.8 Parallax 61.2 37% 46.2 fps	MRender 30.1 Gravity 46.9 Splatting 40.1 32% 39 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 159GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3367 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 908 (B1) Unknown 98 98 30 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 47 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 72 (F1) Unknown 99 99 15868442736	80.5% Excellent	Read 511 Write 404 Mixed 417 99% 444 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 81.1 4K Mixed 18.6 105% 41.6 MB/s	DQ Read 34.3 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 18.4 39% 75.1 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 124%
Hitachi HDS723030BLE640 3TB 852 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 276GB free Firmware: MX6OAAB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 71 (03) Spinup time 136 136 34387394981 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 7039 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 17722 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3395 (C0) Power-off retract count 95 95 7041 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 7041 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 296352808992 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	83.5% Excellent	Read 150 Write 141 Mixed 143 109% 145 MB/s	4K Read 0.92 4K Write 1.95 4K Mixed 0.19 96% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 104%
Seagate ST1500VM002-9UY16L 1.5TB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 249GB free Firmware: SC01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 110 98 27847168 (03) Spinup time 93 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 37 37 65535 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 79 60 8786987920 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 11900 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3079 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 62 62 38 (BC) Unknown 100 99 38655819800 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 49 471466012 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 340 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 265931 (C2) HDA temperature 28 51 4294967324 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 35 21 27847168 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 5	68.8% Good	Read 124 Write 116 Mixed 111 88% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.03 4K Mixed 0.2 74% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 66%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 174GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 163 157 6816 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10371 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 53 53 34374 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4487 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 130 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 10346 (C2) HDA temperature 119 88 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 62 389474 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	34.2% Below average	Read 59.2 Write 59.6 Mixed 60.6 45% 59.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.82 4K Mixed 0.4 104% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB 10,124 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	62.2% Good	MC Read 22.1 MC Write 22.1 MC Mixed 19.7 61% 21.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 18.7 SC Mixed 19.2 53% 18.5 GB/s	Latency 55.7 72% 55.7 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 5,616 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	1,406x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,166x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	1,071x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	375x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	366x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	302x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	214x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	196x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	149x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	138x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	131x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	105x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $364

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16