MSI Trinergy (MS-7580)

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	MSI MS-7580
Motherboard	MSI Trinergy (MS-7580) (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110303
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 06 '18 at 22:39
Run Duration	278 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	45%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-750-$72 43,796 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	58% Above average	Memory 79.6 1-Core 76.6 2-Core 157 62% 104 Pts	4-Core 206 8-Core 245 29% 225 Pts	64-Core 332 20% 332 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200 83,027 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Sapphire(174B E308) CLim: 1010 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.5.2 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.9% Below average	Lighting 37.7 Reflection 47.3 Parallax 49.3 31% 44.8 fps	MRender 46.6 Gravity 36.3 Splatting 34 31% 39 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3015 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 424 (B1) Unknown 99 99 18 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 58 55 42 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 89 (F1) Unknown 99 99 21069962048	45.2% Average	Read 230 Write 191 Mixed 179 44% 200 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 32.7 4K Mixed 14.2 75% 24.4 MB/s	DQ Read 34.4 DQ Write 65.2 DQ Mixed 17.8 23% 39.1 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 134%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174 9,888 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1TB free Firmware: 81.H0A81 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 137 137 104 (03) Spinup time 149 149 25793659230 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 440 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 18 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3150 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 440 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 533 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 533 (C2) HDA temperature 153 153 184684773415 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	89.4% Excellent	Read 155 Write 156 Mixed 145 114% 152 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 3.36 4K Mixed 0.42 136% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 113%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150 16,916 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 419GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 181 170 5950 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10331 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 60 60 29708 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2968 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 220 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 105 105 287646 (C2) HDA temperature 114 108 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	36.1% Below average	Read 53.8 Write 71.9 Mixed 19.4 35% 48.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.08 4K Mixed 0.2 59% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 55%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$178 20,205 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 200GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 146 10266 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 845 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7644 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 844 (10) Unknown 3 197 59125049032 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 117 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 727 (C2) HDA temperature 113 109 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	65.8% Good	Read 148 Write 81.6 Mixed 131 91% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 2.36 4K Mixed 0.31 107% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 98%
Generic USB SD Reader 32GB 196 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 29GB free, PID 6200 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 19.5 Write 4.21 10% 11.9 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1140, 1140 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	31.7% Below average	MC Read 10.3 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 10.6 31% 11 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 7.1 20% 6.93 GB/s	Latency 81.3 49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Trinergy (MS-7580) Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI Trinergy (MS-7580)

CPU
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	2x
Core i7 K 875Intel $180Bench 70%, 2,354 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	1x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	1x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	1x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $129Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	1x
Green 240GB (2016)WDBench 53%, 20,831 samples	1x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	2x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $427

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16