Asus CM1855

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	37.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus CM1855 (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20121114
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 14 '18 at 12:06
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	49%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8300-$168 49,767 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	49.6% Average	Memory 64.2 1-Core 30.7 2-Core 88.9 38% 61.3 Pts	4-Core 190 8-Core 334 32% 262 Pts	64-Core 353 22% 353 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Asus(1043 854E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1535 MHz, MLim: 1959 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.64 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	Lighting 48 Reflection 47.1 Parallax 42.3 39% 45.8 fps	MRender 43.5 Gravity 41.9 Splatting 37.7 33% 41 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SC400S37128 128GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: 505ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 106 106 13056444 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 118901874630492 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3458 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 1654 (B1) Unknown 0 0 7 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 28 77 73019490332 (C2) HDA temperature 28 77 73019490332 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 13056444 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 13056444 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 13056444 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 93 93 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 36369 (EA) Unknown 0 0 12377 (F1) Unknown 0 0 12377 (F2) Unknown 0 0 13452	39.3% Below average	Read 458 Write 115 Mixed 141 51% 238 MB/s	4K Read 11.2 4K Write 27.3 4K Mixed 3.55 36% 14 MB/s	DQ Read 99.3 DQ Write 76.7 DQ Mixed 36.1 41% 70.7 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 451GB free Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 105 99 9343152 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5342 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 75 60 41091847 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 7467 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3475 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 53 454361115 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 218 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 81 81 39271 (C2) HDA temperature 27 47 68719476763 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -126310693203382 (F1) Unknown 100 253 12515123668 (F2) Unknown 100 253 27986715982	111% Outstanding	Read 212 Write 176 Mixed 152 135% 180 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.27 88% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata MI64C1D1629Z1 2x8GB 2,816 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	44.2% Average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 16.9 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 7.3 18% 6.2 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CM1855 Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus CM1855

CPU
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	17x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	10x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	5x

GPU
HD 7770AMDBench 12%, 38,053 samples	6x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	3x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	3x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	2x
M4 128GBCrucial $116Bench 60%, 34,516 samples	1x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	1x

RAM
MI64C1D1629Z1 2x8GBAdataBench 54%, 2,816 samples	4x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	3x
AO2L16BC8R2-BR2S Corsair CML16GX3M2A1600C10 16GBAdataBench 25%, 4 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $211

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16