Xxxxxx Satellite X205

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Xxxxxx Satellite X205 (all builds)
Motherboard	XXXXXX ISRAA
Memory	3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20101213
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 15 '18 at 04:39
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T7500-$90 4,281 User benchmarks, average bench 35% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	37.9% Below average	Memory 67.9 1-Core 26.6 2-Core 48.3 34% 47.6 Pts	4-Core 49.8 8-Core 49.2 7% 49.5 Pts	64-Core 49.3 3% 49.3 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8700M GT 317 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 FF00) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	2.4% Terrible	Lighting 2.7 Reflection 5.35 Parallax 0.91 2% 2.98 fps	MRender 4.52 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 3.78 3% 3.4 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.4% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OSC 60GB 60GB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0327B0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 13 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 100 (A3) Unknown 100 100 12 (A4) Unknown 100 100 1705 (A5) Unknown 100 100 6 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 3 (A8) Unknown 100 100 7000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 12 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 45 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 46 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 2070 (F2) Unknown 100 100 1228 (F5) Unknown 100 100 873	35.2% Below average	Read 258 Write 76.9 Mixed 195 39% 177 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 41.4 4K Mixed 4.06 57% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 88.8 DQ Write 109 DQ Mixed 8.48 32% 68.8 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 58%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013) 72,354 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 302GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 426 (03) Spinup time 154 143 1283 (04) Start/Stop count 76 76 24445 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 8306 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2164 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 978 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 185 185 45819 (C2) HDA temperature 109 94 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 226 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 97 97 2362	54.9% Above average	Read 93 Write 98.1 Mixed 74.8 66% 88.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 2.01 4K Mixed 0.26 88% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.7% Very poor	MC Read 5.8 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 3.7 12% 4.33 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 4.1 13% 4.4 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite X205 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Xxxxxx Satellite X205

CPU
Core2 Duo T9300Intel $70Bench 38%, 3,287 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce 8700M GTNvidiaBench 2%, 317 samples	2x

SSD
X110 128GBSanDisk $89Bench 71%, 11,245 samples	2x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 28% - Poor

Total price: $159

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16