PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 44% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 51.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus Rampage III Extreme (all builds) |
Memory | 6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110317 |
Uptime | 4.2 Days |
Run Date | Jun 24 '18 at 20:16 |
Run Duration | 244 Seconds |
Run User | AUT-User |
Background CPU | 16% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7 980-$148
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
|
66.2%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Zotac(19DA 1314) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
44%
Average
|
|||
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.65
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.7%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
51.1%
Above average
|
||||
54.3%
Above average
|
||||
83.6%
Excellent
|
||||
34.2%
Below average
|
||||
37.9%
Below average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
|
38%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7 X 980Intel $148Bench 76%, 8,133 samples | 146x |
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 128x |
Core i7 X 990Intel $499Bench 78%, 4,994 samples | 94x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 57x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 39x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 39x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $628 |