HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3397
Memory	20.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180212
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 02 '18 at 08:19
Run Duration	190 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	62%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	64.1% Good	Memory 78.5 1-Core 98.3 2-Core 170 68% 115 Pts	4-Core 271 8-Core 378 41% 325 Pts	64-Core 508 31% 508 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Lighting 19.6 Reflection 15.4 Parallax 18.6 16% 17.8 fps	MRender 16.4 Gravity 18.8 Splatting 20.2 15% 18.5 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 156 150 156 154 156 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	83.3% Excellent	Read 371 Write 382 Mixed 347 SusWrite 165 71% 316 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 71.2 4K Mixed 40.4 135% 47.2 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 346 DQ Mixed 344 264% 359 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 124%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 8TB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 36 37 35 34 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Read 151 Write 32.2 Mixed 26.3 SusWrite 35.9 45% 61.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.2 129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 123%
WD WD30EZRS-00J99B0 3TB 2,807 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 43 41 53 51 37 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	33.4% Below average	Read 70.8 Write 49.9 Mixed 37.8 SusWrite 45.5 38% 51 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.2 45% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 72%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 474GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 92 94 91 91 95 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	55.7% Above average	Read 101 Write 86.7 Mixed 62 SusWrite 92.5 63% 85.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273EB0-CK0 Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF M378B5273EB0-CK0 Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 24GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53.2% Above average	MC Read 20.1 MC Write 19.3 MC Mixed 16.2 53% 18.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 17.7 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 83.3 48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,400 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	2,463x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,460x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	797x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	1,919x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	722x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	487x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	266x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	83x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	78x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	64x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	56x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	52x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16