Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics90.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive41% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX CODE  (all builds)
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161228
Uptime9.4 Days
Run DateJul 10 '18 at 03:15
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 91.3
1-Core 142
2-Core 258
92% 164 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 761
73% 600 Pts
64-Core 792
49% 792 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 4998) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1582 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 121
Parallax 109
95% 116 fps
MRender 98
Gravity 105
Splatting 96
81% 99.8 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 54 57 58 53 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
41% Average
Read 460
Write 69.5
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 50.6
34% 158 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 11.6
67% 16 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 41%
Great: 126%
Hitachi HDS723015BLA642 1.5TB
279GB free
Firmware: MN5OA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 75 72 79 73 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 53.5
Write 74.7
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 67.5
42% 57 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.2
79% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 79%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 3TB
220GB free, PID a0a4
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 70 68 133 132 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 86.5
Write 122
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 111
140% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.3
14% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x16GB-$74
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.3% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 23.1
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 22.4
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,300 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,133
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback