Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics57.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170922
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 11 '18 at 23:44
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 89.3
1-Core 28.2
2-Core 67.4
44% 61.6 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 450
33% 300 Pts
64-Core 837
52% 837 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.3% Above average
Lighting 50
Reflection 75.7
Parallax 115
41% 80.1 fps
MRender 97.8
Gravity 125
Splatting 105
90% 110 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 60GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 507ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 100 104 104 101 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 335
Write 126
Mixed 156
SusWrite 104
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 36.6
4K Mixed 25
92% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 108
85% 117 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 80%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
116GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 90 90 86 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 95.3
Write 90
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 88.4
60% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 59%
General USB Flash Disk 16GB
6GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 6 4.8 5.7 7.5 6.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Write 2.2
SusWrite 5.4
6% 3.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Mixed 0
27% 2.45 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
42% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 12.5
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 8
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 42%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 3,018 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback